AI Tool Rank earns commissions when you sign up through our links. This doesn't affect our recommendations or scores. Learn more
coding

Bolt.new vs Lovable

A detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose.

Bolt.new

Browser-based AI coding environment that builds and runs full-stack apps from a single prompt

8.0Excellent

Lovable

AI full-stack engineer that builds and deploys production-ready web apps from natural language descriptions

8.0Excellent

Our Verdict

It's a close call

Bolt.new (8.0) and Lovable (8.0) are virtually tied. Your best pick depends on your specific needs and budget.

Feature Comparison

FeatureBolt.newLovable
API Access
Plugins / Extensions
Image Generation
Code Execution
File Upload
Web Search
Max Context Window
128K tokens
128K tokens

Pricing Comparison

TierBolt.newLovable
Free
Free

Limited daily tokens, public projects only

Free

5 messages/day, public projects only

Pro
$20

10M tokens/month, private projects, faster models

$20

100 messages/month, private projects, custom domains

Teams
$40

Per seat, shared projects, admin controls

$50

500 messages/month, team collaboration, Supabase integration

Scale
$100

Unlimited messages, priority support, advanced features

Score Breakdown

DimensionBolt.newLovable
Ease of Use9.09.0
Features8.08.0
Value for Money8.08.0
Support7.07.0
Overall8.08.0

Pros & Cons

Bolt.new

Pros

  • +Zero setup — entire dev environment runs in the browser
  • +Generates and runs full-stack apps end-to-end
  • +One-click deploy to Netlify or StackBlitz
  • +Great for rapid prototyping and demos

Cons

  • Token limits can be hit fast on large apps
  • Complex apps require significant manual editing afterward
  • No persistent workspace on free tier

Lovable

Pros

  • +Builds complete full-stack apps with auth, database, and UI
  • +Native Supabase integration for backend and data storage
  • +One-click deploy with instant public URL
  • +GitHub sync lets developers extend and customize code

Cons

  • Message limits make extended projects expensive
  • Complex business logic often requires manual developer intervention
  • Generated code quality varies — review before production use

Related Comparisons